DHT11 vs DHT22 | Difference between DHT11 and DHT22
Introduction
DHT11 and DHT22 are two of the most commonly used temperature and humidity sensors in electronics and IoT applications. They are widely used in weather stations, home automation, and agricultural monitoring due to their ease of use, low cost, and compatibility with microcontrollers like Arduino and Raspberry Pi.
While both sensors serve the same purpose, they differ in terms of accuracy, response time, operating range, and cost. This article provides a detailed comparison to help you choose the right sensor for your project.
Overview of DHT11 and DHT22
DHT11
- Measures temperature and humidity.
- Lower cost and less accurate than DHT22.
- Limited operating range.
- Suitable for hobby projects and basic applications.
DHT22 (AM2302)
- More precise and has a wider measurement range.
- Slightly more expensive than DHT11.
- Better suited for applications requiring higher accuracy.
Technical Specifications Comparison
Feature | DHT11 | DHT22 (AM2302) |
---|---|---|
Temperature Range | 0°C to 50°C | -40°C to 80°C |
Temperature Accuracy | ±2°C | ±0.5°C |
Humidity Range | 20% – 90% RH | 0% – 100% RH |
Humidity Accuracy | ±5% RH | ±2% RH |
Resolution | 8-bit | 16-bit |
Sampling Rate | 1 reading per second | 0.5 readings per second |
Operating Voltage | 3.3V – 5V | 3.3V – 6V |
Power Consumption | Low | Low |
Response Time | 1 second | 2 seconds |
Cost | Lower | Slightly higher |
Key Differences Between DHT11 and DHT22
1. Measurement Range
- DHT11: Works only between 0°C and 50°C, making it unsuitable for extreme temperature conditions.
- DHT22: Can measure temperatures from -40°C to 80°C, making it better for industrial and outdoor use.
2. Accuracy
- DHT11: Has a temperature accuracy of ±2°C and humidity accuracy of ±5% RH.
- DHT22: More accurate with ±0.5°C temperature accuracy and ±2% RH humidity accuracy.
3. Resolution
- DHT11: Provides 8-bit data resolution.
- DHT22: Provides 16-bit data resolution, which results in more precise readings.
4. Sampling Rate
- DHT11: 1 reading per second (1Hz sampling rate).
- DHT22: 0.5 readings per second (takes a reading every 2 seconds).
5. Cost
- DHT11 is cheaper than DHT22, making it ideal for cost-sensitive projects.
- DHT22 is slightly more expensive, but the improved accuracy and range justify the price.
6. Physical Appearance
- DHT11 is typically blue and smaller in size.
- DHT22 is white and slightly larger.
Which Sensor Should You Choose?
Requirement | Best Choice |
---|---|
Budget-friendly projects | DHT11 |
High accuracy needed | DHT22 |
Extreme temperature monitoring | DHT22 |
Indoor basic weather station | DHT11 |
Industrial or outdoor monitoring | DHT22 |
When to Use DHT11
- If you need basic temperature and humidity readings.
- For applications within 0°C to 50°C.
- When you need low-cost sensors.
- Best for beginner electronics projects.
When to Use DHT22
- If you need precise measurements.
- When working with extreme temperatures (-40°C to 80°C).
- If high humidity accuracy is important.
- Suitable for industrial, agricultural, and scientific applications.
Interfacing DHT11 and DHT22 with Microcontrollers
Both sensors use a single-wire digital communication protocol and can be connected to microcontrollers like Arduino, ESP8266, Raspberry Pi, etc.
Example: Connecting DHT11/DHT22 to Arduino
Wiring:
DHT Pin | Arduino Pin |
---|---|
VCC | 5V |
Data | Digital Pin 2 |
GND | GND |
Arduino Code for Reading Data
#include <DHT.h>
#define DHTPIN 2 // Pin connected to the sensor
#define DHTTYPE DHT22 // Use DHT11 or DHT22 accordingly
DHT dht(DHTPIN, DHTTYPE);
void setup() {
Serial.begin(9600);
dht.begin();
}
void loop() {
float temperature = dht.readTemperature();
float humidity = dht.readHumidity();
Serial.print("Temperature: ");
Serial.print(temperature);
Serial.print(" °C Humidity: ");
Serial.print(humidity);
Serial.println(" %");
delay(2000); // Delay for stable readings
}
Explanation:
- The
DHT.h
library is used to communicate with the sensor. - The temperature and humidity values are read and displayed on the serial monitor.
DHT22 & DHT11 Pinout
DHTxx Data Format
When Humidity and Temperature sensor sends data, it sends the MSB first. The 40bits of data is divided into 5 bytes. For DHT11 sensor 2nd and 4th byte is always Zero. The significance of these bytes is as follows:
- 1st Byte: Relative Humidity Integral Data in % (Integer Part)
- 2nd Byte: Relative Humidity Decimal Data in % (Fractional Part) – Zero for DHT11
- 3rd Byte: Temperature Integral in Degree Celsius (Integer Part)
- 4th Byte: Temperature in Decimal Data in % (Fractional Part) – Zero for DHT11
- 5th Byte: Checksum (Last 8 bits of {1st Byte + 2nd Byte + 3rd Byte+ 4th Byte})
Conclusion
Both DHT11 and DHT22 are excellent choices for temperature and humidity sensing. The choice depends on the accuracy, range, and budget of your project:
- DHT11 is more affordable and works well for simple projects.
- DHT22 offers better accuracy and a wider range, making it ideal for advanced applications.
By understanding the differences, you can select the best sensor based on your specific requirements.
You may like also:
- ESP32 BLE with DHT11
- DHT11 sensor with NodeMCU using Arduino IDE
- How To Enable Free HTTPS on your website
- How To Create Secure MQTT Broker
Pingback: IoT Sensors and Actuators - IoTbyHVM - Bits & Bytes of IoT
Pingback: Log Temperature Sensor Data to Google Sheet using NodeMCU ESP8266
Pingback: IoT Sensors and Actuators - CompileIoT - Explore Internet of Things
You said the DHT11 is slightly slower. This is incorrect. The DHT11 will take 1 reading every second, 1Hz. The DHT22 is one reading every 2 seconds, 0.5Hz. This makes the DHT22 half the speed of the DHT11.
In other aspects, yes the DHT22 is more accurate, but if you want faster, less accurate reads, DHT11 is the one.
Thanks for your attention. You are right Now I updated this post.
Actually I add “slightly slower” word in conclusion para. This was my mistake.
Thanks for your attention.
I already mentioned all in this post, as you are saying.